The old Conservative slogan, ‘Labour Isn’t Working’, deserves a modern update, fasten your seat belts, here we go…
‘Labour Is Not Working — And It Doesn’t Have To.’
That, in a nutshell, is the governing philosophy of today’s Labour Party. Contra-intuitively, the objective is not to produce policies that expand the economy, attract investment, or generate wealth. The point is to throw ideological red meat to the party faithful! This comprises a steady diet of anti-business, anti-success, and anti-aspiration measures, designed to satisfy the socialists’ insatiable appetite for ‘class warfare’.
If the economy suffers in the process – so, be it! After all, the applause from the party conference is all that matters, not the nation’s welfare.
RENTERS’ RIGHTS, FEWER RENTALS
For example, the Renters’ Rights Bill was marketed as a triumph for tenants and the glee on Angie Rayner’s face when she spearheaded this piece of daft legislation, was palpable.
However, in reality it has frightened off thousands of private landlords into selling their buy-to-let properties… duh!
This is the problem when you have career politicians interfering in the dynamics of markets – the word ‘clueless’ comes to mind.
“The consequence? A shrinking supply of rental homes and rapidly rising rents.”
The consequence? A shrinking supply of rental homes and rapidly rising rents.
Those hardest hit are not wealthy professionals in fashionable postcodes, but vulnerable families, young workers and low-income tenants competing for an ever-diminishing pool of properties.
In Labour’s world, if a policy makes housing less affordable but allows ministers to denounce ‘greedy landlords,’ it is considered a political success. What a topsy-turvy world this represents.
WORKERS’ RIGHTS BILL
The so-called Workers’ Rights Bill is a classic example of Labour’s economic vandalism dressed up as moral virtue.
Combined with higher National Insurance contributions and aggressive increases in the minimum wage, it sends a clear message to employers:
Hiring people is becoming uneconomic, a legal hazard, and to be avoided where possible.
When the cost of employing someone rises, employers do what logic dictates – they hire fewer people.
The result is predictable. Youth unemployment rises, opportunities disappear and the very people Labour claims to champion are left standing outside the jobs market looking in.
BLOATED WELFARE
When you add this social scourge to the bloated welfare programme that has ballooned since Covid, you have a country in sharp decline and before we look around, we will be back to the dark days of the 70s, if this government carries on with its ideological pursuits.
But never mind, the trade unions are delighted and that is what really counts to the Labour Party.
Bandits, who falsely claim Universal Credit but ‘moonlight’ for cash, have never had it so good and are far better off than their tax paying, hard-working peers in conventional jobs.
NON-DOM REFORMS: EXPORTING THE TAX BASE
Labour’s assault on non-domiciled taxpayers was sold to the Electorate as a painless way to fund more doctors and nurses for the NHS. If you tax the rich, we were told, the money will just roll in: How ‘Disneyesque’ was this?
The reality is rather different.
Need we remind ourselves that there is nothing more mobile than a high-net-worth individual escaping from a draconian tax regime, as they are not chained to British soil.
They have options and many have exercised them, and rightly so.
Monaco, Dubai, Milan, and other low-tax jurisdictions are rolling out the red carpet while Britain waves goodbye to these precious entrepreneurs, investors, and job creators.
The exodus of thousands of wealthy residents means fewer investments; fewer jobs; less philanthropy and ultimately, less tax revenue for HM Revenue and Customs, as is evidenced by The Sunday Times Rich List 2026.
It is the fiscal equivalent of ‘slaughtering the goose that lays the golden eggs’ and then wondering why breakfast is so spartan.
VAT ON PRIVATE SCHOOLS: EQUALITY THROUGH DECLINE
Now let’s turn to the next folly of the Socialists; the decision to impose VAT on private school fees. This was sold to us as another ‘fairness’ measure that would somehow enrich the public purse. Go figure…
Instead, some independent schools have faced closure, whilst many pupils are shunted into the already overstretched State sector.
This creates additional costs for taxpayers and greater pressure on class sizes, resources, and teaching standards. What a result!
But the economics of this issue were never the point, if you get my drift!
For many on the Left, there is a real sense of schadenfreude by penalising those who make sacrifices to educate their children privately. If educational standards fall but social resentment rises, the policy is judged a triumph. What a peculiar, inverted scenario.
Instead, they should give tax incentives to those who use private schools, which will ‘take the load’ off the State school system, and pupils in both these will be far better off.
POLITICS OF ENVY
This is the central truth about modern Labour economics: the numbers are secondary, and symbolism is everything.
Lest we forget, a policy does not need to raise revenue, it does not need to improve productivity or create jobs and it doesn’t even need to work. How sad is that?
It merely needs to signal virtue and provide a gratifying opportunity to ‘soak the rich,’ scold business owners and reassure the activist base that capitalism remains the enemy of socialism.
This is a government obsessed by gesture, with economics driven by slogan and taxation imposed by resentment.
THE NATIONAL COST
The cumulative effect is profound:
- Employers become more cautious
- Investors become more nervous
- Entrepreneurs become more mobile
- Landlords become sellers
- Wealth creators become expatriates
- The tax base becomes weaker
Britain grows poorer while ministers congratulate themselves on their moral superiority.
THEATRICAL PERFORMANCE
Labour’s economic programme resembles a theatrical performance in which ideology takes centre stage and arithmetic is verboten.
The purpose was never to make the country richer but to make Labour electable and this cynical objective certainly succeeded in July 2024.
Unfortunately, whatever your politics, we should take no pleasure in witnessing the turmoil of the present Labour Party leadership chaos, since it does appear that whoever is the Prime Minister until the end of the electoral term, will ensure that we will all “…suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune…” (Hamlet Act III Scene l – William Shakespeare).
Whether it’s Starmer or Burnham, it is like being a ‘kid in hospital in the 60s and being told that Jimmy Savile’s visit has been cancelled, only to hear in the corridor the sound of a didgeridoo, followed by a chorus of Tie Me Kangaroo Down Sport’.
